Yesterday, City Council approved a map for Chicago’s 50 aldermanic wards. The decision comes after a many-month saga of debate both in and out of city hall.
“This has taken longer than the Sistine Chapel,” said 40th ward alderman Pat O’Connor to the Chicago Sun-Times.
Discussions got so heated in early December Aldermen almost came to blows in a racially tinged argument. According to the Sun-Times:
[Richard] Mell was described as genuinely “afraid somebody was gonna hit him.” A police officer was summoned to the third-floor to restore order. At one point, Ald. Pat O’Connor (40th), Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s City Council floor leader, told Mell to shut up because he was exacerbating racial tensions, a source said.
Luckily, the new map passed without too much bloodletting. However the map puts six incumbents on the chopping block, including Alderman Bob Fioretti who attempted to delay the vote by employing a parliamentary maneuver. Mayor Rahm Emanuel promptly used a different parliamentary maneuver to counter Fioretti’s motion.
In the subsequent vote, the city map passed by a 41 to 8 vote; it takes exactly 41 aldermen to skirt a costly referendum; a referendum in 1991 cost taxpayers a whopping $20 million. So when it is time for Chicagoans to vote on March 20th, they will not be forced to choose between two rival versions of the map.
Some major changes are being made. As a consequence of Chicago losing over 200,000 African Americans in the past decade, the black caucus will lose one aldermanic seat. Conversely, the Latino Caucus, due to their 25,000 person increase, will get 13 Hispanic wards as opposed to their current eight. Englewood downsized from six wards to five.
But City Council isn’t completely out of the woods; although a referendum is being avoided, other parties could potentially file a lawsuit against the city if they deem the map unfair.
For previous coverage, check out our article.


















